Philosophy and Kalam

Philosophy and Kalam

The Fallibility of Reason and the Epistemic Justification of Religious Beliefs Reconstructing the Authority of Reason in Imami Rational Theology

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
PhD Graduate in Imami Theology, Department of Islamic Theology and Beliefs, Faculty of Islamic Sciences and Teachings, University of Quran and Hadith, Qom, Iran.
10.22059/jitp.2026.411423.523711
Abstract
Awareness of human fallibility raises a fundamental question: Can religious beliefs remain epistemically justified, or does the possibility of rational error undermine their epistemic standing? Using an analytical-critical method and the theory of epistemic defeaters, this study evaluates an argument that moves from awareness of rational fallibility to the collapse of reason-based justification for religious beliefs. It combines contemporary epistemic analysis with a rereading of rational authority in Imami theological texts. The findings show that the collapse argument conflates three levels: the general possibility of error, an actual defeater in a particular case, and the global unreliability of reason. Fallibility disrupts a belief’s justificatory status only when specific and relevant evidence indicates a malfunction in the belief-forming process at issue. General awareness of cognitive limitation has no such effect, while a global denial of rational authority weakens the rational basis of that denial itself. Imami rational theology therefore supports a model of “limited but reliable reason.” Reason derives its authority not from infallibility or self-sufficiency, but from ordinary reliability, correctability, and a complementary relationship with revelation. This model reconciles critical rationality with epistemically responsible religious commitment.
Keywords
Subjects

Ahl Sarmadi, N (2021). The status of reason in Shaykh Mufid’s theological thought: A critical examination of existing views. Kheradname-ye Sadra, 26 (103) , 39-50. (in Persian)
Alston, W. P (1989). Epistemic justification: Essays in the theory of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
----- (1991). Perceiving God: The epistemology of religious experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Aquinas, T (1947). Summa theologica (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). New York: Benziger Bros.
Audi, R (2011). Epistemology: A contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Bergmann, M (2006). Justification without awareness: A defense of epistemic externalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Christensen, D (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81 (1) , 185-215.
Craig, W. L. ,& Moreland, J. P. (Eds.) (2009). The Blackwell companion to natural theology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Feldman, R (2003). Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Goldman, A. I (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hilli, H. ibn Y. ibn Muṭahhar (1993). Kashf al-murād fī sharḥ Tajrīd al-iʿtiqād. Qom: Mu’assasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. (in Arabic)
Kahneman, D (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Khodaparast, A (2015). Religious belief and rational autonomy. Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 13 (26) , 91-112. https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2016.1750  (in Persian)
Kulayni, M. ibn Yaʿqūb (1986). Al-kāfī (Vol. 1). Qom: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah. (in Arabic)
Mobini, M. A (2003). The rationality of religious belief from an externalist perspective. Journal of Philosophy of Religion, 1 (1) , 9-43. https://doi.org/10.30497/prr.2012.1221 (in Persian)
Mobini, M. A. ,& Abbasi, V (2003). Reformed epistemology and the rationality of religious belief. Qabasat, (28) , 45-68. (in Persian)
Motavalli, M. ,& Dorri Nogoorani, A (2024). The rationality of religious belief from the perspectives of John Greco and Linda Zagzebski: An inadequate defense grounded in the epistemology of testimony. Philosophy and Kalam, 57 (1) , 285-305. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitp.2024.376382.523501  (in Persian)
Mufid, M. ibn M (1993). Awāʾil al-maqālāt fī al-madhāhib wa al-mukhtārāt. Qom: Congress of Shaykh al-Mufīd. (in Arabic)
Murtada, A. ibn al-Ḥ (1990). Al-dhakhīrah fī ʿilm al-kalām (Vol. 1). Qom: Mu’assasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. (in Arabic)
Pakdel, M. , Yazdani, A. ,& Bayat, M (2025). Exploring the compatibility of faith and inquiry within the framework of Howard-Snyder’s view. Philosophy and Kalam, 58 (2) , 347-367. https://doi.org/10.22059/jitp.2025.394811.523609  (in Persian)
Plantinga, A (1993). Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press.
----- (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, J. L (1986). Contemporary theories of knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowman& Littlefield.
Pritchard, D (2012). Epistemological disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Qorbani, G (2019). Criteria for evaluating the rationality of religious beliefs in a holistic approach. Epistemological Studies, 8 (17) , 101-121. (in Persian)
Rezaei, G. ,& Arab Mahfouzi, M. M (2014). The rational method of Imamiyya theology in the era of presence. Islamic Theology, 22 (88) , 73-94. (in Persian)
Rezaei, M. J (2020). The relation between the authority of reason and the authority of the Imam in the thought of Imamiyya companions during the era of presence. Imamiyya Theology, 2, 7-32. (in Persian)
Sadeghi, H. ,& Habibi Sisara, M (2019). A comparative study of the rationality of religious belief in Plantinga and Allameh Tabataba’i. Ayin-e Hekmat, 10 (37) , 85-116. https://doi.org/10.22081/PWQ.2019.66596 (in Persian)
Sosa, E (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tabataba’i, S. M. H (1990). Al-mīzān fī tafsīr al-Qurʾān (Vol. 5). Qom: Daftar Intishārāt-i Islāmī-yi Jāmiʿah-yi Mudarrisīn. (in Arabic)
----- (2007). Nihāyat al-ḥikmah. Qom: Mu’assasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī. (in Arabic)
Thune, M (2010). Religious belief and the epistemology of disagreement. Philosophy Compass, 5 (8) , 712-724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00314.x
Tusi, M. ibn H (1985). Al-iqtiṣād al-hādī ilā ṭarīq al-rashād. Qom: Daftar Intishārāt-i Islāmī. (in Arabic)