<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>51</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Ghazali’s Methodology in Confronting Avicenna’s Philosophy</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Ghazali’s Methodology in Confronting Avicenna’s Philosophy</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>197</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>222</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">69565</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jitp.2018.249816.522995</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Mohammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dibaji</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor in Islamic Philosophy, The College of Farabi, University of Tehran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In the history of philosophy, what is found about Ghazali’s views on philosophy is often his critical ones, so that his views are introduced as a departure point of the Ash&#039;arites rationalism and are regarded as opposing to philosophy, especially, opposing to Avicenna and Farabi’s philosophical views. but, does this show the real position of Ghazali? The answer proposed in this article shows Ghazali’s fascination to Avicenna’s Eastern Hekmat and his following Avicenna’s footsteps. Also, Ghzali’s influence from Avicenna in his methodology and attitude is shown in a phenomenological way; that means, although critical literature of Ghazali, which is due to his political position, made some of his philosophical views, but individually, he is the follower of eastern Hekmat. </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In the history of philosophy, what is found about Ghazali’s views on philosophy is often his critical ones, so that his views are introduced as a departure point of the Ash&#039;arites rationalism and are regarded as opposing to philosophy, especially, opposing to Avicenna and Farabi’s philosophical views. but, does this show the real position of Ghazali? The answer proposed in this article shows Ghazali’s fascination to Avicenna’s Eastern Hekmat and his following Avicenna’s footsteps. Also, Ghzali’s influence from Avicenna in his methodology and attitude is shown in a phenomenological way; that means, although critical literature of Ghazali, which is due to his political position, made some of his philosophical views, but individually, he is the follower of eastern Hekmat. </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ghazali</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Avicenna</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Eastern</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Farabi</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hekmat</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_69565_c7ea10bedbe61c084cf88b0edf606878.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
