<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>50</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Allame Tabatabaei’s Views on the Unity of Divine Attributes and God’s Simplicity</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Allame Tabatabaei’s Views on the Unity of Divine Attributes and God’s Simplicity</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>301</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>313</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">63730</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jitp.2017.214048.522887</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sayyid Shahriyar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kamaali Sabzewari</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Saeidimehr</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Muslim philosophers, including Mulla Sadra, commonly advocate the theory of “the conceptual difference and existential identity of Divine attributes”. Muslim mystics, however, hold that the attribution of Divine attributes is posterior to His essence and that the very essence transcends any attribute or name. Allame Tabatabaei supports the former theory in his &lt;em&gt;Nahaya al-Hikmah&lt;/em&gt; but in some other works like &lt;em&gt;Al-Mizan&lt;/em&gt;, sees the latter as the correct one. In this paper, we argue that the first view leads to an implausible result, namely the composition of the Divine attributes from existence and non-existence.  Then, appealing to the dichotomy of &lt;em&gt;haqiqah/raqiqah&lt;/em&gt; predication we propose a way to reconcile between the two apparently incompatible views of Tabatabaei.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Muslim philosophers, including Mulla Sadra, commonly advocate the theory of “the conceptual difference and existential identity of Divine attributes”. Muslim mystics, however, hold that the attribution of Divine attributes is posterior to His essence and that the very essence transcends any attribute or name. Allame Tabatabaei supports the former theory in his &lt;em&gt;Nahaya al-Hikmah&lt;/em&gt; but in some other works like &lt;em&gt;Al-Mizan&lt;/em&gt;, sees the latter as the correct one. In this paper, we argue that the first view leads to an implausible result, namely the composition of the Divine attributes from existence and non-existence.  Then, appealing to the dichotomy of &lt;em&gt;haqiqah/raqiqah&lt;/em&gt; predication we propose a way to reconcile between the two apparently incompatible views of Tabatabaei.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">allameh tabatabaee</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The unity of Divine attributes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Divine simplicity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">haqiqah/raqiqah predication</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_63730_b0fcb9d1f60854c53e71d9068c493122.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
