Univrsity Of Tehran Press Philosophy and Kalam 2008-9422 50 2 2017 10 23 Semantical Implication and Conceptual Implication Semantical Implication and Conceptual Implication 245 268 63728 10.22059/jitp.2017.202567.522846 FA Ahmad Ebadi 0000-0003-4719-2196 Journal Article 2016 04 03 <em>Usuli</em> experts' theory of conceptual implication, on one hand, and the linguistic philosophers' theory of semantical implication, on the other, can be the subject of a comparative study. Theory of conceptual implication is the basis of the semantic approach. Conceptual implication is the transfer of mind from a term to its meaning regardless of the speaker's intention. Judicial implication is the transfer of mind from a term to the speaker's intended meaning. Semantics is closer to the theory of conceptual implication because semantics is the study of meaning independent of the speaker or author’s intention. Pragmatics is closer to theory of judicial implication because pragmatics is the study of meaning based on the speaker or author’s intention. Of all theories of semantical signification, the use theory of meaning is closer to the theory of conceptual implication because according to both theories, language and the use of terms are socially rule-governed activities. What's more, both theories claim that phrases and terms acquire their meaning through their multiple usages and functions in society. <em>Usuli</em> experts' theory of conceptual implication, on one hand, and the linguistic philosophers' theory of semantical implication, on the other, can be the subject of a comparative study. Theory of conceptual implication is the basis of the semantic approach. Conceptual implication is the transfer of mind from a term to its meaning regardless of the speaker's intention. Judicial implication is the transfer of mind from a term to the speaker's intended meaning. Semantics is closer to the theory of conceptual implication because semantics is the study of meaning independent of the speaker or author’s intention. Pragmatics is closer to theory of judicial implication because pragmatics is the study of meaning based on the speaker or author’s intention. Of all theories of semantical signification, the use theory of meaning is closer to the theory of conceptual implication because according to both theories, language and the use of terms are socially rule-governed activities. What's more, both theories claim that phrases and terms acquire their meaning through their multiple usages and functions in society. https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_63728_c5b6f02af1f5f1d72be4d63c5b0c1858.pdf