<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>49</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Study of Allameh Tabatabaei’s Views on The Concept of Inherent in the Theory of Rational Good and Bad (Al-Husn wa al-Qubh al-'Aqli)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Study of Allameh Tabatabaei’s Views on The Concept of Inherent in the Theory of Rational Good and Bad (Al-Husn wa al-Qubh al-&#039;Aqli)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>159</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>174</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">60785</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jitp.2017.60785</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyed Mohammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dibaji</LastName>
<Affiliation>null</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zeynab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yousefzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>null</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The problem of good and bad in philosophy and theology can be discussed from two perspectives, ontological and epistemological. The problem that we&#039;re seeking to answer in this paper is that: Does the theory of “al-idrakat al-i&#039;tibariyah” (constructive perceptions) has presented a new solution for it?  If yes, which way it has used to deal with the problem (ontological or epistemological)?
The answer that has been discussed is that this theory, by considering the epistemological aspect of al-i&#039;tibariyah in the scope of practical intellect, presents a third meaning for the problem of good and bad and provides an innovative way for the problem.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The problem of good and bad in philosophy and theology can be discussed from two perspectives, ontological and epistemological. The problem that we&#039;re seeking to answer in this paper is that: Does the theory of “al-idrakat al-i&#039;tibariyah” (constructive perceptions) has presented a new solution for it?  If yes, which way it has used to deal with the problem (ontological or epistemological)?
The answer that has been discussed is that this theory, by considering the epistemological aspect of al-i&#039;tibariyah in the scope of practical intellect, presents a third meaning for the problem of good and bad and provides an innovative way for the problem.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">:“al-idrakat al-i'tibariyah” (Constructive Perceptions)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rational Good and Bad</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Practical Intellect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Allameh Tabatabaei</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_60785_fc2bb79b71910391d9c0f534162cde92.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
