Univrsity Of Tehran Press Philosophy and Kalam 2008-9422 49 1 2016 03 20 Critical analysis of commentators’s opinions of Isharat about Divine Unity Critical analysis of commentators’s opinions of Isharat about Divine Unity 35 53 58362 10.22059/jitp.2016.58362 FA Sardar Dekami PhD Student of Tarbiat Modares University. Mohammad Saeedi Mehr Associate Professor of Tarbiat Modares University Journal Article 2015 07 12 <strong> </strong> <br />Ibn Sina, in his Al-Isharat, presents an argument for the Divine Unity based on His Uniqueness. This argument has been the subject of different interpretations by the commentators of Al-Isharat. The first interpretation is whether Ibn Sina presented one argument or two for Divine Uniqueness.  The second is whether his argument against the uniqueness outside God’s essence is one or two. There are also interpretations on what Ibn Sina meant by “… wa baqy al-aqsaam muhaal” (“  …Other options are impossible”). In this paper we will investigate all the three interpretations and propose the correct one in each case. <strong> </strong> <br />Ibn Sina, in his Al-Isharat, presents an argument for the Divine Unity based on His Uniqueness. This argument has been the subject of different interpretations by the commentators of Al-Isharat. The first interpretation is whether Ibn Sina presented one argument or two for Divine Uniqueness.  The second is whether his argument against the uniqueness outside God’s essence is one or two. There are also interpretations on what Ibn Sina meant by “… wa baqy al-aqsaam muhaal” (“  …Other options are impossible”). In this paper we will investigate all the three interpretations and propose the correct one in each case. https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_58362_43bfa7df8a79e34e4207110ffaaedb19.pdf