<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>44</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An Investigation of ‘Verity-Propositions’ (qadaya haqiqiyyah) of Islamic Logicians and Law-like Statements as Presented by Nelson Goodman</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An Investigation of ‘Verity-Propositions’ (qadaya haqiqiyyah) of Islamic Logicians and Law-like Statements as Presented by Nelson Goodman</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>43</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>62</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">23672</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ebadi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4719-2196</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Faramarz Qaramaleki</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The purpose of this article is to present a comparative study of the views of Islamic logicians on ‘verity-propositions’ and Nelson Goodman’s ideas on law-like statements. In order to achieve this, first we describe the analyses of Islamic logician of the meaning of factual proposition and Goodman`s presentation of law-like statements. Then, using a comparative approach, we explain the points of agreement and divergence of these two viewpoints. In this way it will be shown that despite a number of foundational differences, there are many similarities, the systematic investigation of which would have great scholarly importance. These similarities include: universality and possibility of being generalized, the strengthening and confirmation of counterfactual conditionals, and the capacity to give scientific explanation and prediction. As opposed to these similarities, law-like statements are derived from induction while verity-propositions are not so derived.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The purpose of this article is to present a comparative study of the views of Islamic logicians on ‘verity-propositions’ and Nelson Goodman’s ideas on law-like statements. In order to achieve this, first we describe the analyses of Islamic logician of the meaning of factual proposition and Goodman`s presentation of law-like statements. Then, using a comparative approach, we explain the points of agreement and divergence of these two viewpoints. In this way it will be shown that despite a number of foundational differences, there are many similarities, the systematic investigation of which would have great scholarly importance. These similarities include: universality and possibility of being generalized, the strengthening and confirmation of counterfactual conditionals, and the capacity to give scientific explanation and prediction. As opposed to these similarities, law-like statements are derived from induction while verity-propositions are not so derived.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Counterfactual conditionals</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Law-like statements</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nelson Goodman.</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Scientific explanation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">verity propositions</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_23672_9ba2a4540c32fc7901b57123d5d378c7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
