<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>42</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Critical Study of John Hick’s Religious Pluralism</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Critical Study of John Hick’s Religious Pluralism</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">21053</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Amir Abbas</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alizamani</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Marjan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nuri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>John Hick’s pluralism hypothesis is an endeavor from and within Christian tradition to explain the relation of Christianity with other world religions. His basically claim is that all religions epistemologically have the same value and do well in leading their followers to the ultimate salvation. For justifying his claim, Hick has to defend his hypothesis at two levels: first he has to defend the realism of religious statements (against non-realists), and second he has to defend the pluralistic interpretation of religious diversity (against exclusivists and inclusivists). However, it seems that pluralism model has intrinsic oppositions which are addressed in this article in three types of criticism. These criticisms will finally ascertain that Hick&#039;s pluralistic model is: (1) not pluralistic,   (2) not acceptable in Christian tradition, and (3) not successful in achieving its predetermined goal.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">John Hick’s pluralism hypothesis is an endeavor from and within Christian tradition to explain the relation of Christianity with other world religions. His basically claim is that all religions epistemologically have the same value and do well in leading their followers to the ultimate salvation. For justifying his claim, Hick has to defend his hypothesis at two levels: first he has to defend the realism of religious statements (against non-realists), and second he has to defend the pluralistic interpretation of religious diversity (against exclusivists and inclusivists). However, it seems that pluralism model has intrinsic oppositions which are addressed in this article in three types of criticism. These criticisms will finally ascertain that Hick&#039;s pluralistic model is: (1) not pluralistic,   (2) not acceptable in Christian tradition, and (3) not successful in achieving its predetermined goal.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Christian tradition</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">non_realism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Religious experience</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religious pluralism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Truth claims</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_21053_b4e817145de2bd8fee92f2c3114d43fc.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
