<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>58</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>02</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Unconditioned Condition of Consciousness:
Avicenna on the Nature of “Self-Awareness”</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Unconditioned Condition of Consciousness:
Avicenna on the Nature of “Self-Awareness”</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>371</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>388</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">105788</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jitp.2025.394421.523605</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sajad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amirkhani Shahraki</LastName>
<Affiliation>Lecturer and researcher in Islamic philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This article examines Avicenna’s doctrine of &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt;, or “self-awareness,” and argues that, because it is unmediated by forms or cognitive faculties, this awareness is not of the order of conceptual or representational knowledge. Consequently, &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt; must be distinguished from various forms of self-knowledge that rely on conceptual cognition. According to Avicenna, this awareness possesses three essential features: actuality, permanence, and immediacy. He regards &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt; as the condition for the possibility of every other act of cognition and awareness, since in every judgment—even those whose subject is “I”—the agent is already and pre-reflectively aware that it is &lt;em&gt;he himself&lt;/em&gt; who makes the judgment. For this reason, self-awareness, for Avicenna, is axiomatic, a priori, and independent of any other form of cognition: while it constitutes the necessary ground of all awareness, it is itself grounded in nothing beyond itself. Thus, &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt; can be understood as a kind of non-conceptual, a priori awareness that is the unconditioned condition of every other consciousness. This doctrine of self-awareness, though partially resonant with certain analytic-philosophical accounts, is identical with none of them.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This article examines Avicenna’s doctrine of &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt;, or “self-awareness,” and argues that, because it is unmediated by forms or cognitive faculties, this awareness is not of the order of conceptual or representational knowledge. Consequently, &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt; must be distinguished from various forms of self-knowledge that rely on conceptual cognition. According to Avicenna, this awareness possesses three essential features: actuality, permanence, and immediacy. He regards &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt; as the condition for the possibility of every other act of cognition and awareness, since in every judgment—even those whose subject is “I”—the agent is already and pre-reflectively aware that it is &lt;em&gt;he himself&lt;/em&gt; who makes the judgment. For this reason, self-awareness, for Avicenna, is axiomatic, a priori, and independent of any other form of cognition: while it constitutes the necessary ground of all awareness, it is itself grounded in nothing beyond itself. Thus, &lt;em&gt;shuʿūr bi-dhāt&lt;/em&gt; can be understood as a kind of non-conceptual, a priori awareness that is the unconditioned condition of every other consciousness. This doctrine of self-awareness, though partially resonant with certain analytic-philosophical accounts, is identical with none of them.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Self-awareness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Shuʿūr bi-dhāt</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">introspection</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pre-reflective self-awareness</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Avicenna</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_105788_7b0fc9bdfa005af97b3389fa48e0b542.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
