<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univrsity Of Tehran Press</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy and Kalam</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9422</Issn>
				<Volume>58</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Concept of Pure Monotheism, its Foundations and Implications in Rajab-‘Ali Tabrizi’s Neo-Peripatetic School</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Concept of Pure Monotheism, its Foundations and Implications in Rajab-‘Ali Tabrizi’s Neo-Peripatetic School</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>51</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">101582</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jitp.2025.381489.523535</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahmud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hedayatafza</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>26</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The most distinctive feature of Rajab-‘Ali Tabrizi’s Neo-Peripatetic school and his students is their interpretation of divine essence and attributes based on negative theology (tanzīh). This study, using primary sources from Tabrizi and his students and employing a descriptive-analytical method, examines the concept of &quot;pure monotheism&quot; in this intellectual framework. This concept is articulated in their works through an explanation of the arguments for the negation of attributes and its implications for understanding the meanings of God&#039;s names. Tabrizi argues that attributes of perfection—such as knowledge and power—are neither identical with the One Essence nor accidental to it. His particular understanding of &quot;attribute&quot; and its distinction from essence paved the way for his assertion of the absolute negation of attributes. To rationally support his position, Tabrizi presents a general argument against the union of two distinct entities and a specific argument against the union of essence and attribute. He also cites textual evidence from Imamī sources, particularly the monotheistic sermons of Imam ‘Alī and Imam al-Riḍā. Furthermore, in the works of Tabrizi and his students, we find responses to potential objections against the negation of attributes doctrine. To address these concerns, they propose a significant framework for understanding the meanings of God’s names in theological statements, based on negative theology, theology of divine actions, and interpretative theology.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The most distinctive feature of Rajab-‘Ali Tabrizi’s Neo-Peripatetic school and his students is their interpretation of divine essence and attributes based on negative theology (tanzīh). This study, using primary sources from Tabrizi and his students and employing a descriptive-analytical method, examines the concept of &quot;pure monotheism&quot; in this intellectual framework. This concept is articulated in their works through an explanation of the arguments for the negation of attributes and its implications for understanding the meanings of God&#039;s names. Tabrizi argues that attributes of perfection—such as knowledge and power—are neither identical with the One Essence nor accidental to it. His particular understanding of &quot;attribute&quot; and its distinction from essence paved the way for his assertion of the absolute negation of attributes. To rationally support his position, Tabrizi presents a general argument against the union of two distinct entities and a specific argument against the union of essence and attribute. He also cites textual evidence from Imamī sources, particularly the monotheistic sermons of Imam ‘Alī and Imam al-Riḍā. Furthermore, in the works of Tabrizi and his students, we find responses to potential objections against the negation of attributes doctrine. To address these concerns, they propose a significant framework for understanding the meanings of God’s names in theological statements, based on negative theology, theology of divine actions, and interpretative theology.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Negative theology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">negation of attributes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">meaningfulness of God's Names</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">pure monotheism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rajab-‘Ali Tabrizi</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Qāḍī Sa‘īd Qummī</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jitp.ut.ac.ir/article_101582_3ac58d0bcbe2adf42b28f72df030a291.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
